Rural-urban disparity in cancer burden and care: findings from an Indian cancer registry.

BACKGROUND: Cancer incidence and mortality vary across the globe, with nearly two-thirds of cancer-related deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries. The rural-urban disparity in socio-demographic, behavioural, and lifestyle-related factors, as well as in access to cancer care, is one of the contributing factors. Population-based cancer registries serve as a measure for understanding the burden of cancer. We aimed to evaluate the rural-urban disparity in cancer burden and care of patients registered by an Indian population-based cancer registry. METHODS: This study collected data from Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India, between 2017 and 2019. Sex and site-specific age-standardised rates for incidence and mortality per 100,000 population were calculated. Rural-urban disparities in cancer incidence and mortality were estimated through rate differences and standardised rate ratios (with 95% confidence intervals). Univariable and multivariable regressions were applied to determine any significant differences in socio-demographic and cancer-related variables according to place of residence (rural/urban). Crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: 6721 cancer patients were registered during the study duration. Urban patients were older and had better literacy and socioeconomic levels, while rural patients had higher odds of having unskilled or semi-skilled professions. Diagnostic and clinical confirmation for cancer was significantly higher in urban patients, while verbal autopsy-based confirmation was higher in rural patients. Rural patients were more likely to receive palliative or alternative systems of medicine, and urban patients had higher chances of treatment completion. Significantly higher incidence and mortality were observed for oral cancer among urban men and for cervical cancer among rural women. Despite the higher incidence of breast cancer in urban women, significantly higher mortality was observed in rural women. CONCLUSIONS: Low- and middle-income countries are facing dual challenges for cancer control and prevention. Their urban populations experience unhealthy lifestyles, while their rural populations lack healthcare accessibility. The distinctness in cancer burden and pattern calls for a re-evaluation of cancer control strategies that are tailor-made with an understanding of urban-rural disparities. Context-specific interventional programmes targeting risk-factor modifications, cancer awareness, early detection, and accessibility to diagnosis and care are essential.

Role of verbal autopsy in cancer registration: A mixed-methods study from the population-based cancer registry of Northern India.

OBJECTIVES: To describe utilisation of verbal autopsy as one of the data collection approaches in cancer registration in an Indian setting. We aimed to estimate the proportion and epidemiological characteristics of malignancies identified by the Varanasi population-based cancer registry (PBCR) using verbal autopsy between 2017 and 2019 and to develop a thematic network for implementing verbal autopsy. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional mixed-methods study. Quantitative methods were applied to analyse information from PBCR proforma of the verbal autopsy-confirmed cancers; qualitative methods were applied to evaluate verbal autopsy conducted by field staff from key informants. In-depth interviews of field staff for the challenges and potential solutions during verbal autopsy were assessed. RESULTS: Of 6466 registered cancers, 1103 (17.1%) were verbal autopsy-confirmed cancers, which had no other source of information. The majority of verbal autopsy cases were from vulnerable populations who were aged >50 years (721, 65.4%), female (607, 55.1%), from rural backgrounds (853, 77.3%), illiterate or just able to read and write (636, 57.7%), and from lower and middle-income groups (823, 74.6%). Verbal autopsy helped provide information about symptoms and site of disease, diagnostic and treatment details, and disease status. Major challenges during verbal autopsy described by field staff were incomplete cancer treatment, destruction of medical records and non-cooperation by the community and lack of support from the local workforce as cancer is not notifiable. CONCLUSION: Verbal autopsy helped identify cancers that would have been missed during active case finding from available resources. The majority of verbal autopsy-confirmed patients belonged to vulnerable populations. Non-cooperation from community and local health systems was major challenge during verbal autopsy. Developing robust cancer awareness, patient navigation, and social support programmes will strengthen verbal autopsy. Integration of standardised and reproducible methods of verbal autopsy in cancer registry and digitalization of health information, especially in limited-resource settings with weak vital registration, will facilitate completeness in cancer registration.

Cancer pattern in Varanasi district from Uttar Pradesh state of India, a foundation for cancer control based on the first report of the population-based cancer registry.

Background: The cancer registry provides reliable data from the population. In this article, we provide cancer burden and its patterns from the Varanasi district. Methods: The method adopted by the Varanasi cancer registry is community interaction along with regular visits to more than 60 sources to collect data on cancer patients. The cancer registry was established by the Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, in 2017 covering 4 million population (57% rural and 43% urban population). Results: The registry has recorded 1,907 incidence cases (1,058 male and 849 female). The age-adjusted incidence rate per 100,000 population in male and female of Varanasi district is 59.2 and 52.1, respectively. One in 15 male and one in 17 female are at risk of developing the disease. Mouth and tongue cancers are the predominant cancers in male, whereas breast, cervix uteri, and gallbladder are the leading cancer sites among the female. In female, cervix uteri cancer is significantly higher (double) in rural areas when compared with urban areas (rate ratio [RR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI; 0.36, 0.72]), whereas in male, mouth cancer is higher in urban areas when compared with rural areas (RR 1.4, 95% CI [1.11, 1.72]). More than 50% of cancer cases in male are due to tobacco consumption. There may be underreporting of the cases. Conclusion: The results of the registry warrant policies and activities related to early detection services for the mouth, cervix uteri, and breast cancers. The Varanasi cancer registry is the foundation for cancer control and will play an important role in the evaluation of the interventions.